 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
If  is the set of points
 is the set of points  in
 in 
 such that
 such that  and
 and
 , then we showed in (2.6) that
, then we showed in (2.6) that
 
 
 .
.
The right side of (2.13) is greater than 
 and the
left side is less than
 and the
left side is less than 
 for all
 for all 
 , but by taking
, but by taking
 large enough, both sides can be made as close to
 large enough, both sides can be made as close to 
 as
we please.  Hence we conclude that the ratio
 as
we please.  Hence we conclude that the ratio
 is equal to
 is equal to 
 .  Thus, we have proved the following theorem:
.  Thus, we have proved the following theorem:
 be a positive real number and let
 be a positive real number and let  be the set of points
 be the set of points  in
 in
 such that
 such that  and
 and 
 .  Then
.  Then 
 
 
Remark: The last paragraph of the proof of theorem 2.14 is a little bit vague. How large is ``large enough'' and what does ``as close as we please'' mean? Archimedes and Euclid would not have considered such an argument to be a proof. We will reconsider the end of this proof after we have developed the language to complete it more carefully. (Cf Example 6.54.)
The first person to calculate the area of a parabolic segment was
Archimedes
(287-212 B.C.).  The parabolic segment considered by Archimedes corresponds to
the set  bounded by the parabola
 bounded by the parabola  and the line joining
 and the line joining 
 to
 to
  where
 where  .
.
 
 just described is
 just described is
 .  Use theorem 2.14 and any results from
Euclidean geometry that you need.  You may assume that
.  Use theorem 2.14 and any results from
Euclidean geometry that you need.  You may assume that  .  The cases
where
.  The cases
where  and
 and  are all handled by similar arguments.
 are all handled by similar arguments.
The result of this exercise shows that the area of a parabolic segment depends
only on its width.  Thus the segment determined by the points  and
 and
 has the same area as the segment determined by the points
has the same area as the segment determined by the points  and
 and
 , even though the second segment is 400 times as tall as the
first, and both segments have the same width.  Does this seem reasonable?
, even though the second segment is 400 times as tall as the
first, and both segments have the same width.  Does this seem reasonable?
Remark: Archimedes 
stated his result about the area of a parabolic segment
as follows. The area of the parabolic segment cut off by the
line  is four thirds of the area of the inscribed triangle
 is four thirds of the area of the inscribed triangle  , where
, where
 is the point on the parabola at which the tangent line is parallel
to
 is the point on the parabola at which the tangent line is parallel
to  . We cannot verify Archimedes formula at this time, because we do 
not know how to find the point
. We cannot verify Archimedes formula at this time, because we do 
not know how to find the point  .
.
 
 . In this case you can use
your intuition to find the tangent line.
. In this case you can use
your intuition to find the tangent line.
The following definition is introduced as a hint for exercise 2.18
 ) 
 
If
) 
 
If  is a subset of
 is a subset of 
 , then the reflection of
, then the reflection of  about
the line
 about
the line  is defined to be the set of all points
 is defined to be the set of all points  such that
 such that
 .
.
 
If  denotes the reflection of
 denotes the reflection of  about the line
 about the line
 , then
, then  and
 and  have the same area.
 have the same area.
 and let
 and let  be the set
of all points
 be the set
of all points  such that
 such that 
 and
 and 
 .
Sketch the set
.
Sketch the set  and find its area.
 and find its area.
 square
 square  has been divided into two
has been divided into two  triangles and two trapezoids by means
of the lines
 triangles and two trapezoids by means
of the lines  ,
,  and
 and  . In the second figure the four pieces have
been rearranged to form an
. In the second figure the four pieces have
been rearranged to form an  rectangle. The square has
area
 rectangle. The square has
area  , and the rectangle has area
 , and the rectangle has area  . Where did the extra unit
of area come from? (This problem was taken from W. W. Rouse Ball's Mathematical Recreations [4, page 35]. Ball says that the earliest
reference he could find for the problem is 1868.)
. Where did the extra unit
of area come from? (This problem was taken from W. W. Rouse Ball's Mathematical Recreations [4, page 35]. Ball says that the earliest
reference he could find for the problem is 1868.)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
