 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 be a positive number, let
 be a positive number, let  be a positive number,
 and let
 be a positive number,
 and let  be the set of points
 be the set of points  in
 in
 such that
such that  and
 and 
 .  In this section we will
begin an investigation of the area of
.  In this section we will
begin an investigation of the area of  .
.
 
Our discussion will not apply to negative values of  , 
 since we make frequent use of the fact that for all non-negative
numbers
, 
 since we make frequent use of the fact that for all non-negative
numbers  and
 and  
 
 is not defined when
is not defined when  is negative.
 is negative.
The figures for the argument given below  are for  the case  ,
 but you should observe
that the proof does not depend on the pictures.
,
 but you should observe
that the proof does not depend on the pictures.
 
Let  be a positive integer, and for
 be a positive integer, and for 
 , let
, let 
 .
.
Then 
 for
 for  , so the points
, so the points  divide
the interval
divide
the interval ![$[0,a]$](img190.gif) into
 into  equal subintervals.  For
 equal subintervals.  For  , let
, let 
 
 , then
, then 
 for some index
 for some index  , and
, and 
 , so
, so
 
 
 , then
, then 
 and
 and 
 so
 so 
 .  Hence,
.  Hence, 
 for all
 for all  , and
hence
, and
hence
 
 
 
 intersect only along their boundaries, we have
 intersect only along their boundaries, we have
 
Thus it follows from equations (2.1) and (2.2) that 
The geometrical question of finding the area of  has led us
to the numerical problem of finding the sum
 has led us
to the numerical problem of finding the sum
 
 
Notice that 
 . Thus equation
(2.4) can be written as
. Thus equation
(2.4) can be written as
 .
.
Now we will specialize to the case when  .
A direct calculation shows that
.
A direct calculation shows that
 , but it is not
particularly easy to guess this formula on the basis of these calculations. 
With
the help of my computer, I checked that
, but it is not
particularly easy to guess this formula on the basis of these calculations. 
With
the help of my computer, I checked that
 
 
 
 
 in equation (2.6) we see that
 in equation (2.6) we see that
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
