Next: 7.4 Sums and Products
Up: 7. Complex Sequences
Previous: 7.2 Convergence
  Index
Sequences that converge to are simpler to work with than general sequences, and
many of the convergence theorems for general sequences can be easily deduced from the
properties of sequences that converge to . In this section we will just consider
sequences that converge to .
7.11
Definition (Null sequence.)
Let
be a
sequence in
. We will say
is a
null
sequence if and only if for every
there is some
such that for every
,
.
By comparing this definition with definition 7.10, you see that
Definition 7.11 is important. You should memorize it.
7.12
Definition (Dull sequence.)
Let
be a sequence in
. We say
is a
dull sequence if and only if
there is some
such that
for every
in
, and
for every
.
The definitions of null sequence and dull sequence use the same words, but they are
not in the same order, and the definitions are not equivalent.
If satisfies condition (7.12), then whenever ,
If
, this condition would say , which is false.
Hence
if , then
; i.e., if , then . Hence a
dull sequence has the property that there is some
such that for
all . Thus every dull sequence is a null sequence. The sequence
is a dull sequence, but
is not a dull sequence. In the next theorem we show that
is
a null sequence, so null sequences are not necessarily dull.
7.13
Theorem.
.
For all
,
is a null sequence
Proof:
Let
. By the Archimedean property for
, there is an
such that
.
Then for all
,
so for all
.
The difference between a null sequence and a dull sequence is that the `` " in
the definition of null sequence can (and usually does) depend on , while
the ``" in the definition of dull sequence depends only on . To emphasize
that depends on (and also on ), I will often write
or
instead of .
Here is another reformulation of the definition of null sequence.
7.14
Definition (Precision function.)
Let
be a complex sequence. Then
is a null sequence if and only if
there is a function
such that
I will call such a function
a
precision function for .
This formulation shows that in order to show that a sequence is a null sequence, you need to find a function
such that
In the proof of theorem
7.13, for the sequence
we had
This description for could be made more precise, but it is good enough for our
purposes.
7.15
Theorem.
If
, then the constant
sequence
is not a null sequence.
Proof: If , then
. Suppose, to get a
contradiction, that is a null sequence. Then there is a number
such that for all
. Then for all
,
|
(7.16) |
If then (7.16) is false and this shows that is not a null
sequence.
7.17
Theorem (Comparison theorem for null sequences.)
Let be
complex sequences. Suppose that is a null sequence and that
Then is a null sequence.
Proof: Since is a null sequence, there is a function
such
that for all
,
Then
Hence, we can let .
7.18
Example.
We know that
for all
, so
for all
. Since
is a null sequence, it follows from the comparison theorem that
is a null sequence. Also, since
for all
, we see that
is a null sequence.
7.19
Theorem (Root theorem for null sequences.)
Let
be a null sequence, and let
. Then
is a null sequence where
for all
.
Scratchwork: Let
. I want to find so that for all
and all
,
i.e.
i.e.
This suggests that I should take
.
Proof: Let be a null sequence in and let be a precision
function for . Define
by
for all
. Then for all
,
Hence is a precision function for .
7.20
Examples.
Let
. Then
is a null
sequence in
, so it follows that
is a
null sequence.
Consider the sequence
. For all
,
Hence
, so it follows from the
comparison theorem that
is a null sequence.
Since
is a null sequence, it follows
from the root theorem that
is a null sequence. Now
,
so
so
for all
, and by another comparison test,
is a null sequence. Since
,
it follows that
is a null sequence for all
with
.
You probably suspect that is a null sequence for all
with . This is correct, but we will not prove it yet.
7.21
Exercise.
A
Show that the geometric sequences
and
that are sketched above 7.1 are in fact
null sequences.
7.23
Entertainment.
Show that
is a null sequence.
(If you succeed, you will probably find a proof that
is a null
sequence whenever
.) NOTE: If you use calculator operations, then
is not a null sequence on most calculators.
It follows from remark 5.38 that we can add, subtract and multiply complex
sequences, and that the usual associative, commutative, and distributive laws hold.
If and then
and
. If
then the constant sequences
satisfy
7.24
Exercise.
A
Which of the field axioms
are satisfied by addition and
multiplication of sequences? Does the set of complex sequences form a field? (You
know that the associative, distributive and commutative laws hold, so you just need
to consider the remaining axioms.
7.25
Notation.
If
is a complex sequence, we define sequences
,
,
, and
by
7.26
Theorem.
Let be a complex null sequence.
Then ,
,
and are all null sequences.
Proof: All four results follow by the comparison theorem. We have, for all
:
Next: 7.4 Sums and Products
Up: 7. Complex Sequences
Previous: 7.2 Convergence
  Index