If 
 is the set of points 
 in 
 such that 
 and
, then we showed in (2.6) that
The right side of (2.13) is greater than 
 and the
left side is less than 
 for all 
, but by taking
 large enough, both sides can be made as close to 
 as
we please.  Hence we conclude that the ratio
 is equal to 
.  Thus, we have proved the following theorem:
Remark: The last paragraph of the proof of theorem 2.14 is a little bit vague. How large is ``large enough'' and what does ``as close as we please'' mean? Archimedes and Euclid would not have considered such an argument to be a proof. We will reconsider the end of this proof after we have developed the language to complete it more carefully. (Cf Example 6.54.)
The first person to calculate the area of a parabolic segment was
Archimedes
(287-212 B.C.).  The parabolic segment considered by Archimedes corresponds to
the set 
 bounded by the parabola 
 and the line joining 
 to
 
 where 
.
.  Use theorem 2.14 and any results from
Euclidean geometry that you need.  You may assume that 
The result of this exercise shows that the area of a parabolic segment depends
only on its width.  Thus the segment determined by the points 
 and
has the same area as the segment determined by the points 
 and
, even though the second segment is 400 times as tall as the
first, and both segments have the same width.  Does this seem reasonable?
Remark: Archimedes 
stated his result about the area of a parabolic segment
as follows. The area of the parabolic segment cut off by the
line 
 is four thirds of the area of the inscribed triangle 
, where
 is the point on the parabola at which the tangent line is parallel
to 
. We cannot verify Archimedes formula at this time, because we do 
not know how to find the point 
.
The following definition is introduced as a hint for exercise 2.18
If 
 denotes the reflection of 
 about the line
, then 
 and 
 have the same area.