Next: 17. Antidifferentiation Techniques
 Up: Math 111 Calculus I
 Previous: 15.3 Convexity
     Index 
  16.1   
Definition (Nice functions.) 
I will say that a real valued function 

 defined on an interval 
![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif)
 is a
nice function on 
![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif)
, if 

 is continuous on 
![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif)
 
and integrable on every subinterval of 
![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif)
.
 
Remark:  We know that piecewise monotonic continuous functions on 
are
nice.  It turns out that every continuous function on 
 is nice, but we
are not
going to prove this.  The theorems stated in this chapter for nice functions
are usually stated for continuous functions.  You can find a proof that every
continuous
function on an interval 
 is integrable on 
 (and hence that every
continuous function on 
 is nice on 
) in [44, page 246]
or in
[1, page 153].  However both of these sources use a slightly
different
definition of continuity and of integral than we do, so you will need to do
some work
to translate the proofs in these references into proofs in our terms.  You
might try
to prove the result yourself, but the proof is rather tricky.  For all the
applications we will make in this course, the functions examined will be
continuous
and piecewise monotonic so the theorems as we prove them are good enough.
  16.2   
Exercise. 
A
Can you give an example of a continuous function on a closed interval
that is
not piecewise monotonic?
You may describe your example rather loosely, and you do not need to
prove that it is continuous.
 
Proof:  By the definition of antiderivative, 
 is continuous on 
 and
 on 
.  Let 
 be arbitrary points in 
.  I will
suppose
.  (Note that if (16.4) holds 
when 
, then it holds when
,
since both sides of the equation change sign when 
 and 
 are interchanged.
 Also
note that the theorem clearly holds for 
.) 
Let 
 be any partition of 
, and let 
 be an
integer
with 
.  If 
 we can apply the mean value theorem to
 on
 to find a number 
 such that
If 
, let 
.  Then 
 is a sample for
such that
We have shown that for every partition 
 of 
 there is a sample 
 for
such that
Let 
 be a sequence of partitions for 
 such that
,
and for each 
 let 
 be a sample for 
 such that
Then, since 
 is integrable on 
,
  16.5   
Example. 
The fundamental theorem will allow us to evaluate many integrals easily.  For
example, we know that 

. 
Hence, by the fundamental theorem,
This says that the two sets
and
have the same area - a rather remarkable result.
 
Proof:  Since 
 is continuous on 
 we can find numbers 
such
that
By the inequality theorem for integrals
(here 
 and 
 denote constant functions) i.e.,
i.e.,
We can now apply the intermediate value property to 
 on the interval whose
endpoints are 
 and 
 to get a number 
 between 
 and 
 such that
The number 
 is in the interval 
, so we are done. 
  16.8   
Exercise. 
A
Explain how corollary 
16.7 follows
 from theorem 
16.6. (There is nothing to show unless 

)
 
Proof:  Let 
. I will show that 
 is continuous at 
.
 Since 
 is integrable on 
 there is a number 
 such that
By the corollary to the inequality theorem for integrals (8.17), it
follows
that
for all 
.  Thus, for all 
,
Now 
, so by the squeezing rule
for limits of functions,
.
It follows that 
.
Proof:  Let 
and let 
 be a point in 
.  Let 
 be any sequence in
 such that 
.  Then
By the mean value theorem for integrals, there is a number 
 between 
and
 such that
Now 
and since 
, 
we
have 
, by the squeezing rule for sequences.
  Since 
 is continuous, we conclude that
; i.e.,
i.e.,
This proves that 
 for 
.  In addition 
 is
continuous
on 
 by lemma 16.9.  Hence 
 is an antiderivative for 
 on
. 
Remark Leibnitz's 
statement of the fundamental principle of the calculus was
the following:
Differences and sums are the inverses of one another, that is
to say, the sum of the differences of a series is a term of the series,
and the difference of the sums of a series is a term of the 
series; and I enunciate the former thus, 
,  and the
 latter thus, 
[34, page 142].
To see the relation between Leibnitz's formulas and ours, in the equation
, write 
 to get 
, or
. This corresponds to equation
(16.11). Equation (16.4) can be written as
If we cancel the 
's (in the next chapter we will show that this
is actually justified!) we get 
. This is
not quite the same as 
. However if  you choose the
origin of coordinates to be 
, then the two formulas
coincide.
To emphasize the inverse-like relation between differentiation and
integration, I will restate our formulas for both parts of the
the fundamental theorem, ignoring all hypotheses:
By exploiting the ambiguous notation for indefinite integrals, we
can get a form almost identical with Leibniz's:
  16.12   
Example. 
Let
We will calculate the derivatives of 

, and 

.  By the fundamental
theorem,
Now 

, so by the chain rule,
We have 

, so by the product rule,
 
  16.13   
Exercise. 
Calculate the derivatives of the following functions.  Simplify your
answers as
much as you can.
- a)
 
- 
 
- b)
 
- 
 
- c)
 
- 
 
- d)
 
- 
 
- e)
 
- 
.
 
(We defined 

 and 

 in exercise 
14.56.)  Find simple
formulas
(not involving any integrals) for 

 and for 

.
A
 
  16.15   
Exercise. 
Let 

 and 

 be the functions whose graphs are shown below:
Let 

 for 

.  Sketch the graphs of 

and

. Include some discussion about why your answer is correct.
 
 
 
  
 
 Next: 17. Antidifferentiation Techniques
 Up: Math 111 Calculus I
 Previous: 15.3 Convexity
     Index 
Ray Mayer
2007-09-07