Next: 12. Extreme Values of
 Up: 11. Calculation of Derivatives
 Previous: 11.2 Some General Differentiation
     Index 
  11.26   
Definition (
.) 
Let 

 be sets and let 

 be functions. 
The composition of 

 and 

 is the function 

 defined by:
i.e., 

 is the set of all points 

 such that 

is defined.  The rule for 

 is
 
  11.27   
Example. 
If 

 and 

, then
and
Thus
So in this case 

.  Thus composition is not a commutative
operation.
If 
 and 
, then
and
 
  11.28   
Exercise. 
For each of the functions 

 below,
find functions  

 and 

 such that 

. Then find a formula
for 

.
- a)
 
- 
.
 
- b)
 
- 
.
 
- c)
 
- 
.
 
 
  11.29   
Exercise. 
A
Let
Calculate formulas for 

, 

,

,

, 

, and 

.
 
  11.30   
Entertainment (Composition problem.) 
From the previous exercise you
should be able to find a  subset 

 of 

, and a function 

 such that 

for all 

. You should also be able to find a subset 

 of 

and a function 

 such that 

 for all 

. Can you find a subset 

 of 

, and a function

 such that 

 for
 
all 

? One obvious example is the function 

 from the previous 
example. To make the
problem more interesting, also add the condition that 

for some 

 in 

. 
 
Before we prove the theorem we will give a few examples of how it is used:
  11.32   
Example. 
Let 

.  Then 

 where
Hence
Let 
.  Then 
 where
Hence
Usually I will not write out all of the details of a calculation like this. 
I will just write:
Let 
.  Then 
.
 
Proof of chain rule:  Suppose 
 is differentiable at 
 and 
 is differentiable at
.  Then
  | 
(11.33) | 
 
Since 
 is differentiable at 
, we know that
Hence the theorem will follow from  (11.33), the definition of 
derivative, and the
product rule for limits of functions, if we can show that
Since 
 is differentiable at 
, it follows from lemma 11.17
that 
  | 
(11.34) | 
 
Let 
 be a generic sequence in 
, such
that
. Then by (11.34), we have  
  | 
(11.35) | 
 
Since
 is differentiable at 
, we have
From this and (11.35) it follows that
Since this holds for a generic sequence 
 in 
, we have
which is what we wanted to prove. 
To complete the proof, I should show that 
 is an interior point of 
. This turns out to be rather tricky, so I will omit the proof.
Remark:  Our proof of the chain rule is not valid in all cases,
but it
is valid in all cases where you are likely to use it.  
  The proof fails  in the case where every interval 
 contains a point 
 for which
. (You should check the proof to see where this
assumption was made.)  Constant functions 
 satisfy this condition, but if 
 is
constant then 
 is also constant so the chain rule holds trivially in
this case.  Since the proof in the general case is more technical than
illuminating, I am going to omit it. Can you find a non-constant function 
for which the proof fails?
  11.36   
Example. 
If 

 is differentiable at 

, and 

, then
Also
i.e.,
  | 
(11.37) | 
 
I will use this relation frequently.
 
  11.38   
Example (Logarithmic differentiation.) 
 
  Let
  | 
(11.39) | 
 
The derivative of 

 can be found by using the quotient rule and the product
rule
and the chain rule.  I will use a trick here which is frequently useful.  I
have 
Now differentiate both sides of this equation using (
11.37) to get
Multiply both sides of the equation by 

 to get
This formula is not valid at points where 

, because we took logarithms
in the calculation.  Thus 

 is differentiable at 

, but our formula for

 is not defined when 

.
The process of calculating 
 by first taking the logarithm of the 
absolute value of 
and then differentiating the result, is called logarithmic
differentiation.
 
  11.40   
Exercise. 
A
Let 

 be the function defined in (
11.39) Show that 

is differentiable at 

, and calculate 

. 
 
 
 
  
 
 Next: 12. Extreme Values of
 Up: 11. Calculation of Derivatives
 Previous: 11.2 Some General Differentiation
     Index 
Ray Mayer
2007-09-07