 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 be real valued functions with domain
 be real valued functions with domain
 and 
domain
 and 
domain
 , and let
, and let 
 .  Suppose
.  Suppose  and
 and  are differentiable at
 are differentiable at
 .  Then
.  Then  ,
,  and
 and  are differentiable at
 are differentiable at  , and
, and
 
Proof: We will prove only the first statement. The proofs of the
other statements are similar. For all 
 we have
 we have
 
 
 
 
 
 
If 
 , then
, then 
 , so
, so 
 
If 
 , then
, then 
 , so
, so
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 and
 and  be real valued functions with
 be real valued functions with 
 and
 and
 .  Suppose
.  Suppose  and
 and  are both differentiable at
 are both differentiable at  . 
Then
. 
Then  is differentiable at
 is differentiable at  and
 and
 
 is a constant function, we have
 is a constant function, we have
 
Proof:  
Let  be a generic point of
 be a generic point of 
 .  Then
.  Then
 and
 and 
 .
 If we
also knew  that
.
 If we
also knew  that 
 , then by basic properties of
limits
we could say that
, then by basic properties of
limits
we could say that
 
This missing result will be needed in some other theorems, so I've isolated it in the following lemma.
 be a real valued function such that
 be a real valued function such that 
 .  Suppose
.  Suppose  is differentiable at a point
is differentiable at a point 
 .  Then
.  Then 
 . (We will define `` continuous" later.  Note
that neither
the statement nor the proof of this lemma  use the 
word `` continuous" in spite of the name of
the lemma.)
. (We will define `` continuous" later.  Note
that neither
the statement nor the proof of this lemma  use the 
word `` continuous" in spite of the name of
the lemma.)
Proof: 
 
 
is the difference between two successive
's; let one of these be
and the other
into
; then we have
 
the omission of the quantityNotice that for Leibniz, the important thing is not the derivative,which is infinitely small in comparison with the rest, for it is supposed that
and
are infinitely small (because the lines are understood to be continuously increasing or decreasing by very small increments throughout the series of terms), will leave
.[34, page 143]
 , but the infinitely small differential,
, but the infinitely small differential,  .
.
 be a real valued function such that
 be a real valued function such that 
 .  Suppose
.  Suppose  is
differentiable at some point
is
differentiable at some point  , and
, and  .  Then
.  Then 
 is
differentiable at
 is
differentiable at  , and
, and
 
Proof:  For all 
 
 
 
 be real valued
 be real valued
 and
 and
 .  Suppose
.  Suppose  and
 and  are both differentiable at
 are both differentiable at  , and that
, and that
 .  Then
.  Then 
 is differentiable at
 is differentiable at  , and
, and
 
 
 
Let 
 .  Then by the product rule
.  Then by the product rule
 
 ).
).
The calculation is not valid at  (since
 (since  is not differentiable 
at
 is not differentiable 
at  , and we divided by
, and we divided by  in the calculation.  However
 in the calculation.  However  is differentiable
at
 is differentiable
at  since
since 
 , i.e.,
, i.e., 
 .  Hence the
formula
.  Hence the
formula
 
 .
.
Let 
 .  Consider
.  Consider  to be a product
 to be a product
 where
 where 
 and
 and  .  Then we can apply the
product rule twice to get
.  Then we can apply the
product rule twice to get
 
 
 .  Prove that
.  Prove that
 
 . It is not easy to derive the formulas backwards.)
. It is not easy to derive the formulas backwards.)
 .
.
 (here
 (here  are constants).
 are constants).
 .
.
 .
.
 ,
,  ,
,  , and
, and  be differentiable
functions defined on
 be differentiable
functions defined on 
 .
.
a) Express  in terms of
 in terms of  ,
,  ,
,  ,
,  ,
,  and
 and  .
.
b) On the basis of your answer for part a), try to guess
a formula for  .  Then calculate
.  Then calculate  , and see whether
your guess was right.
, and see whether
your guess was right.
 
 
 
 
 
  
