Next: 2.6 Area of a
 Up: 2. Some Area Calculations
 Previous: 2.4 Finite Geometric Series
     Index 
The following argument is due to Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665) [19, pages
219-222].  Later we will use Fermat's method to find the area under
the
curve 
 for all 
 in 
.
Let 
 be a real number with 
, and let 
 be the set of points 
in
 such that 
 and 
.  I
want to
find the area of 
.
Let 
 be a positive integer.  Note that since 
, we have
Let 
 be the box
Thus the upper left corner of 
 lies on the curve 
.
To simplify the notation, I will write
Then
and
Hence
Observe that we have here a finite geometric series, so
Now
  | 
(2.32) | 
 
so
  | 
(2.33) | 
 
Let 
 be the box
so that the upper right corner of 
 lies on the curve 
 and 
lies
underneath the curve 
.  Then
Hence,
Since
we have
i.e.,
By combining this result with (2.33), we get
Since 
, we can rewrite this as
  | 
(2.34) | 
 
  2.35   
Exercise. 
What do you think the area of 

 should be?  Explain your answer.  If
you
have no ideas, take 

 in (
2.34),  take large values of 

, 
and by using a calculator, estimate  

 to three or 
four decimal places of
accuracy.
 
  2.36   
Exercise. 
A
Let 

 be a real number with 

, and let 

 be a positive integer. 
Then
Let 

 be the set of points 

 such that 

 and 

.  Draw a sketch of 

, and show that
The calculation of 

 is very similar to the calculation of

.
What do you think the area of 
 should be?
 
  2.37   
Exercise. 
Using the inequalities (
2.6), and the
results of Bernoulli's table in section 
2.2, try to guess what
the area of 

 is for an arbitrary positive integer 

.
Explain the basis for your guess. ( The correct formula for

 for positive integers 

 was stated by
Bonaventura Cavalieri in 1647[
6, 122 ff].
 Cavalieri also found 
a method for computing  general positive integer
power sums.)
 
 
 
  
 
 Next: 2.6 Area of a
 Up: 2. Some Area Calculations
 Previous: 2.4 Finite Geometric Series
     Index 
Ray Mayer
2007-09-07