Next: 9. Properties of Continuous
Up: 8. Continuity
Previous: 8.2 Continuity
  Index
8.20
Definition (Limit point.)
Let

be a subset of

and let

. We say

is a
limit point of

if there is a sequence

in

such that

.
8.22
Exercise.
Supply the proof for Case 2 of example
8.21; i.e., show that

is
a limit point of

.
8.23
Example.
The set

has no limit points. Suppose

, and there is a sequence

in

such that

. Let

for
all

. By the translation thoerem

; i.e.,

is a
null sequence. Let

be a precision function for

. Then for all

,
Now

, so it follows that
and hence
This
contradicts the fact that

for all

.
8.24
Definition (Limit of a function.)
Let

be a complex function, and let

be a limit point of

. We say
that
has a limit at 
or that
exists if there exists a function

with

such that

for all

, and

is continuous at

. In this case we denote the value of

by

or

.
Theorem
8.30 shows that this definition makes sense. We will
give some examples before proving that theorem.
8.25
Warning.
Notice that

is defined only
when

is a limit point of

. For each complex number

, define a function

by
Then

is continuous, and

for all

.
If I did not put the requirement that

be a limit point of

in the above definition, I'd have
I certainly do not want this to be the case.
8.26
Example.
Let

for all

and let

for all

. Then

on

and

is
continuous at

. Hence

.
8.27
Example.
If

, then

, since the function

agrees with

on

and is continuous at

.
8.28
Example.
If

is continuous at

, and

is a limit point of domain

,
then

has a limit at

, and
8.29
Example.
Let

for all

. Then

has no limit at

.
Proof: Suppose there were a continuous function
on
such that
on
. Let
and
. Then
and
and so
and also
Hence we get the contradiction
.
8.30
Theorem (Uniqueness of limits.)
Let
be a complex function, and let
be a limit point of
. Suppose
are two functions each having domain
, and each continuous
at
, and satisfying
for all
. Then
.
Proof:
is continuous at
, and
on
. Let
be a sequence in
such that
.
Since
is continuous at
, we have
i.e.,
so
; i.e.,
.
Proof: Suppose
has a limit at
, and let
be a continuous function with
, and
for all
.
Let
be a sequence in
such that
. Then
is a sequence in
, so by continuity of
,
Hence, condition (8.33) holds with
.
Conversely, suppose there is a number
such that
 |
(8.34) |
Define
by
I need to show that
is continuous at
. Let
be a sequence in
such that
. I want to show that
.
Let
be a sequence in
such that
. (Such a sequence exists because
is a limit point of
). Define a sequence
in
by
Let
and
be precision functions
for
and
respectively. Let
Then
is a precision function for
, since
for all
and all
,
Hence
, and by assumption (8.34), it follows
that
. I now claim that
, and in fact any
precision function
for
is a precision
function for
.
For all
and all
,
This completes the proof.
8.35
Example.
Let
I want to determine whether

has a limit at

, i.e., I want to know whether there is a number

such that for every sequence

in
If

and

then
Since

is either

or

, we have
For each

, define a sequence

by
Then

, and
Hence
It follows that

has no limit at

.
Let
. It is clear that
maps points on the horizontal line
to
other points on the line
. I'll now look at the image of the parabola
under
.
So

maps the right half of the parabola

into the vertical line

, and

maps the left half of the parabola to the line

. Parabolas with

get mapped to the upper half
plane, and parabolas with

get mapped to the lower half plane. The
figure below
shows some parabolas and horizontal lines and their images under

.
8.36
Entertainment.
Explain how the cat's nose in the
above picture gets stretched, while its cheeks get pinched to a point.
(Hint: The figure shows the images of some parabolas

where

. What do the images of the parabolas

look
like when

?)
8.37
Example.
It isn't quite true that `` the limit of the sum is the sum of the limits."
Let
Then from the continuity of the square root function and the composition theorem,
But

does not exist, since

and

is not a limit
point of

.
Proof: Suppose that
and
exist. Let
be any
sequence in
such that
. Then
is a sequence
in both
and
, so
By the sum theorem for limits of sequences,
Hence
has a limit at
, and
.
The other parts of the theorem are proved similarly, and the proofs are left to
you.
8.39
Exercise.
Prove the product theorem for limits; i.e., show that if

are complex
functions such that

and

have limits at

, and if

is a limit point
of

, then

has a limit at

and
8.41
Examples.
The definition of bounded sequence given in
7.41 is a special case of the
definition just given for bounded function.
Let
for all
. Then
is
bounded on
since
However,

is not a bounded function, since
for all

.
Let
(

is the real part of the discontinuous function from example
8.35.)
I claim
is bounded by
. For all
,
(NOTE:

is either

or

.) Hence if

, then
To prove my claim, apply this result with

and

.
8.42
Exercise.
Show that
for all

, and that equality holds if and only
if

. (This shows that

is a bound for the function

in
the previous example.) HINT: Consider

.
Next: 9. Properties of Continuous
Up: 8. Continuity
Previous: 8.2 Continuity
  Index