 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 defined on an interval
 defined on an interval ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) is a
nice function on
 is a
nice function on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) , if
, if  is continuous on
 is continuous on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) and integrable on every subinterval of
 
and integrable on every subinterval of ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) .
.
Remark:  We know that piecewise monotonic continuous functions on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) are
nice.  It turns out that every continuous function on
are
nice.  It turns out that every continuous function on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) is nice, but we
are not
going to prove this.  The theorems stated in this chapter for nice functions
are usually stated for continuous functions.  You can find a proof that every
continuous
function on an interval
 is nice, but we
are not
going to prove this.  The theorems stated in this chapter for nice functions
are usually stated for continuous functions.  You can find a proof that every
continuous
function on an interval ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) is integrable on
 is integrable on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) (and hence that every
continuous function on
 (and hence that every
continuous function on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) is nice on
 is nice on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) ) in [44, page 246]
or in
[1, page 153].  However both of these sources use a slightly
different
definition of continuity and of integral than we do, so you will need to do
some work
to translate the proofs in these references into proofs in our terms.  You
might try
to prove the result yourself, but the proof is rather tricky.  For all the
applications we will make in this course, the functions examined will be
continuous
and piecewise monotonic so the theorems as we prove them are good enough.
) in [44, page 246]
or in
[1, page 153].  However both of these sources use a slightly
different
definition of continuity and of integral than we do, so you will need to do
some work
to translate the proofs in these references into proofs in our terms.  You
might try
to prove the result yourself, but the proof is rather tricky.  For all the
applications we will make in this course, the functions examined will be
continuous
and piecewise monotonic so the theorems as we prove them are good enough.
 be a nice function on
 be a nice function on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) .  Suppose
.  Suppose  is an antiderivative for
 is an antiderivative for
 on
 on
![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) .  Then
.  Then  is an indefinite integral for
 is an indefinite integral for  on
 on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) ; i.e.,
; i.e.,
Proof:  By the definition of antiderivative,  is continuous on
 is continuous on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) and
 and
 on
 on  .  Let
.  Let  be arbitrary points in
 be arbitrary points in ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) .  I will
suppose
.  I will
suppose
 .  (Note that if (16.4) holds 
when
.  (Note that if (16.4) holds 
when  , then it holds when
, then it holds when
 ,
since both sides of the equation change sign when
,
since both sides of the equation change sign when  and
 and  are interchanged.
 Also
note that the theorem clearly holds for
 are interchanged.
 Also
note that the theorem clearly holds for  .)
.) 
Let 
 be any partition of
 be any partition of ![$[p,q]$](img2569.gif) , and let
, and let  be an
integer
with
 be an
integer
with  .  If
.  If  we can apply the mean value theorem to
 we can apply the mean value theorem to
 on
 on
![$[x_{i-1},x_i]$](img3883.gif) to find a number
 to find a number 
 such that
 such that
 
 , let
, let  .  Then
.  Then 
 is a sample for
 is a sample for
 such that
such that
 
 of
 of ![$[p,q]$](img2569.gif) there is a sample
 there is a sample  for
 for
 such that
such that
 
 be a sequence of partitions for
 be a sequence of partitions for ![$[p,q]$](img2569.gif) such that
 such that
 ,
and for each
,
and for each 
 let
 let  be a sample for
 be a sample for  such that
 such that
 
 is integrable on
 is integrable on ![$[q,p]$](img3892.gif) ,
,
 
 . 
Hence, by the fundamental theorem,
. 
Hence, by the fundamental theorem,
 
 
 
 
 be a nice function on an interval
 be a nice function on an interval ![$[p,q]$](img2569.gif) , where
, where  . 
Then
there is a number
. 
Then
there is a number  such that
 such that
 
Proof:  Since  is continuous on
 is continuous on ![$[p,q]$](img2569.gif) we can find numbers
 we can find numbers ![$r,s\in [p,q]$](img3901.gif) such
that
such
that
![\begin{displaymath}f(r)\leq f(x)\leq f(s) \mbox{ for all } x\in [p,q].\end{displaymath}](img3902.gif) 
 
 and
 and  denote constant functions) i.e.,
 denote constant functions) i.e.,
 
 
 on the interval whose
endpoints are
 on the interval whose
endpoints are  and
 and  to get a number
 to get a number  between
 between  and
 and  such that
 such that
 
 is in the interval
 is in the interval  , so we are done.
, so we are done.  
 be a nice function on a closed interval whose endpoints are
 be a nice function on a closed interval whose endpoints are  and
 and  where
 where
 .  Then there is a number
.  Then there is a number  between
 between  and
 and  such that
 such that
 
 )
)
 be a function such that
 be a function such that  is integrable on every subinterval of
 is integrable on every subinterval of
![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) . 
Let
. 
Let ![$c \in [a,b]$](img2104.gif) and let
 and let
![\begin{displaymath}F(x)=\int_c^x f \mbox{ for all } x\in [a,b].\end{displaymath}](img3910.gif) 
 is continuous on
 is continuous on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) .
.
Proof:  Let ![$t \in [a,b]$](img3911.gif) . I will show that
. I will show that  is continuous at
 is continuous at  .
 Since
.
 Since  is integrable on
 is integrable on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) there is a number
 there is a number  such that
 such that
![\begin{displaymath}-M \leq f(x) \leq M \mbox{ for all }x\in [a,b]. \end{displaymath}](img2057.gif) 
 
![$s,t\in [a,b]$](img3913.gif) .  Thus, for all
.  Thus, for all ![$s,t\in [a,b]$](img3913.gif) ,
,
 
 , so by the squeezing rule
for limits of functions,
, so by the squeezing rule
for limits of functions,
 .
It follows that
.
It follows that 
 .
.
 be a nice function on
 be a nice function on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) , and let
, and let ![$c \in [a,b]$](img2104.gif) .  Let
.  Let
![\begin{displaymath}G(x)=\int_c^x f \mbox{ for all } x\in [a,b].\end{displaymath}](img3918.gif) 
 is an antiderivative for
 is an antiderivative for  , i.e.
, i.e.
![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) has an antiderivative on
has an antiderivative on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) .
.
Proof:  Let 
![\begin{displaymath}G(x)=\int_c^x f \mbox{ for all } x\in [a,b]\end{displaymath}](img3920.gif) 
 be a point in
 be a point in  .  Let
.  Let  be any sequence in
 be any sequence in
![$[a,b]\setminus
\{t\}$](img3921.gif) such that
 such that  .  Then
.  Then
![\begin{eqnarray*}
{{G(x_n)-G(t)}\over {x_n-t}} &=& {1\over {x_n-t}}\Big[
\int_c^{x_n}f-\int_c^tf\Big] \\
&=& {1\over {x_n-t}}\int_t^{x_n}f.
\end{eqnarray*}](img3923.gif) 
 between
 between  and
and
 such that
 such that
 
 
 , 
we
have
, 
we
have 
 , by the squeezing rule for sequences.
  Since
, by the squeezing rule for sequences.
  Since  is continuous, we conclude that
 is continuous, we conclude that
 ; i.e.,
; i.e.,
 
 
 for
 for  .  In addition
.  In addition  is
continuous
on
 is
continuous
on ![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) by lemma 16.9.  Hence
 by lemma 16.9.  Hence  is an antiderivative for
 is an antiderivative for  on
 on
![$[a,b]$](img1071.gif) .
.  
Remark Leibnitz's 
statement of the fundamental principle of the calculus was
the following:
Differences and sums are the inverses of one another, that is to say, the sum of the differences of a series is a term of the series, and the difference of the sums of a series is a term of the series; and I enunciate the former thus,To see the relation between Leibnitz's formulas and ours, in the equation, and the latter thus,
[34, page 142].
 , write
, write  to get
 to get 
 , or
, or
 . This corresponds to equation
(16.11). Equation (16.4) can be written as
. This corresponds to equation
(16.11). Equation (16.4) can be written as
 
 's (in the next chapter we will show that this
is actually justified!) we get
's (in the next chapter we will show that this
is actually justified!) we get 
 . This is
not quite the same as
. This is
not quite the same as  . However if  you choose the
origin of coordinates to be
. However if  you choose the
origin of coordinates to be  , then the two formulas
coincide.
, then the two formulas
coincide.
To emphasize the inverse-like relation between differentiation and
integration, I will restate our formulas for both parts of the
the fundamental theorem, ignoring all hypotheses:
 
By exploiting the ambiguous notation for indefinite integrals, we
can get a form almost identical with Leibniz's:
 
 
 , and
, and  .  By the fundamental
theorem,
.  By the fundamental
theorem,
 
 , so by the chain rule,
, so by the chain rule,
 
 , so by the product rule,
, so by the product rule,
 
 
 
 
 
 .
.
 and
 and  in exercise 14.56.)  Find simple
formulas
(not involving any integrals) for
 in exercise 14.56.)  Find simple
formulas
(not involving any integrals) for  and for
 and for  .
A
.
A
 .
.
 .
.
 .
.
 and
 and  be the functions whose graphs are shown below:
 be the functions whose graphs are shown below:
 
 for
 for 
 .  Sketch the graphs of
.  Sketch the graphs of  and
and
 . Include some discussion about why your answer is correct.
. Include some discussion about why your answer is correct.
 
 
 
 
 
  
