Proof: We will prove only the first statement. The proofs of the
other statements are similar. For all
we have
If
, then
, so
If
, then
, so
Proof:
Let be a generic point of
. Then
This missing result will be needed in some other theorems, so I've isolated it in the following lemma.
Proof:
is the difference between two successive
's; let one of these be
and the other
into
; then we have
the omission of the quantityNotice that for Leibniz, the important thing is not the derivative,which is infinitely small in comparison with the rest, for it is supposed that
and
are infinitely small (because the lines are understood to be continuously increasing or decreasing by very small increments throughout the series of terms), will leave
.[34, page 143]
Proof: For all
Let
. Then by the product rule
The calculation is not valid at (since
is not differentiable
at
, and we divided by
in the calculation. However
is differentiable
at
since
, i.e.,
. Hence the
formula
Let
. Consider
to be a product
where
and
. Then we can apply the
product rule twice to get
a) Express in terms of
,
,
,
,
and
.
b) On the basis of your answer for part a), try to guess
a formula for . Then calculate
, and see whether
your guess was right.