Next: 10.3 Definition of the
 Up: 10. Definition of the
 Previous: 10.1 Velocity and Tangents
     Index 
Our definition of tangent to a curve is going to be based on the idea of limit.  The word limit was used in mathematics long before the
definition we
will give was thought of.  One finds statements like `` The limit of a
regular
polygon when the number of sides becomes infinite, is a circle."  Early
definitions
of limit often involved the ideas of time or motion.  Our definition will be
purely
mathematical.
  10.5   
Definition (Interior points and approachable points.) 
Let 

 be a subset of

.  A
 
point 

 is an 
interior point of 

 if there is some positive
number

 such that the interval 

 is a subset of

. 
A point 

 is an 
approachable point from 
 if there is some
positive
number 

 such that either 

 or 

.  (Without loss of generality we could replace `` 

"
in this definition by 

 for some 

.)
 
Note that interior points of 
 must belong to 
.  Approachable points of
 need not belong to 
.  Any interior point of 
 is approachable from
.
  10.7   
Definition (Limit of a function.) 
Let 

 be a real valued function such that

.  Let 

 and let 

.  We say
  | 
(10.8) | 
 
if 
- 1)
 
 is approachable from 
, and
 
- 2)
 
- For every sequence 
 in 
 
 
Note that the value of 
 (if it exists) has no influence on the meaning of
.  Also the `` 
" in (10.8) is a dummy
variable, and can be replaced by any other symbol that has no assigned meaning.
  10.9   
Example. 
For all 

 we have
Also
and
by lemma 
9.34.  Also 
by theorem 
9.37.
 
  10.10   
Example. 

 is not defined.
  Let

.  Then 

 is a sequence in

, and 

and 

.  We know there is no number 

 such that 

.
 
  10.11   
Example. 
Let 

 be the spike function
Then 

, 
since if 

 is a generic sequence in

, then 

 is the constant sequence

.
 
  10.12   
Example. 
The limit
does not exist. If 

, then the domain of 

consists of the single point 

, and 

 is not approachable from 

.
If we did not have condition 
1) in our definition, we would have
which would not be a good thing. (If there are no sequences in

, then
is true, no matter what 

statement about 
![$\{x_n\}{]}$](img2699.gif)
 is.)
In this course we will not care much about functions like
.  
 
  10.13   
Example. 
I  will show that
  | 
(10.14) | 
 
for all 

.  
Case 1: Suppose 
.  Let 
 be a generic sequence in
 such that 
. Then
Now, since 

, we have
so by the squeezing rule

 which is equivalent to
This proves (
10.14) when 

.
Case 2: Suppose 
.
The domain of the square root function is 
, and 
 is approachable
from this set.  
Let 
 be a sequence in 
 such that 
.  To show that
, I'll use the definition of limit.  Let
.  Then 
, so by the definition of 
convergence,
there is an 
 such that for all 
 we have 
. 
Then
for all 
 we have
 
 and hence 
.  
 
Many of our rules for limits of sequences have immediate corollaries as
rules
for limits of functions. For example, suppose 
 are real valued functions with 
 and 
.  Suppose 
and 
.  Let 
 be a generic sequence in
 such that 
.  Then 
is a
sequence in 
 and 
, so
Also 
 is a sequence in 
 and 
 so
By the sum and product rules for sequences, for any 
and
and thus we've proved that
and
Moreover if 
 (so that 
), and if
 for all 
 (so that 
 for all
),
it follows from the quotient rule for sequences that
so that
Actually all of the results just claimed are not quite true as stated.  For we
have
and
but
The correct theorem
is:
Proof: Most of the theorem follows from the remarks made above. We will assume
the remaining parts.
  10.16   
Theorem (Inequality rule for limits of functions.) Let 
 and 
 be  
real functions with 
 and 
. 
Suppose that
- i
 
- 
 and 
 both
exist.
 
- ii
 
 is approachable from 
.
 
- iii
 
- There is a positive number 
 such that
 
Then 
.
 
Proof: Let 
 be a sequence in 
 such that 
. 
Then 
 is a sequence in 
 that converges
to 
, so by the definition of limit of a function,
Similiarly
Also 
 for all 
, so it follows from the inequality
rule for limits of sequences that 
,
i.e. 
.
  10.17   
Theorem (Squeezing rule for limits of functions.) Let 
, 
 and 
 be 
real functions with 
,  
,
and 
. 
Suppose that
- i
 
- 
 and 
 both
exist and are equal. 
 
- ii
 
 is approachable from 
.
 
- iii
 
- There is a positive number 
 such that
 
for all 
 in
.
 
Then 
.
 
Proof: The proof is almost identical to the proof of theorem 10.16.
 
 
  
 
 Next: 10.3 Definition of the
 Up: 10. Definition of the
 Previous: 10.1 Velocity and Tangents
     Index 
Ray Mayer
2007-09-07