 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 is to be broken into four pieces of length
 is to be broken into four pieces of length  and
and  and the pieces are to be assembled to make a rectangle.  How should
 and the pieces are to be assembled to make a rectangle.  How should  and
and
 be chosen if the area of the rectangle is to be as large as possible?  What
is
the area of this largest rectangle?  Before doing the problem you should guess
the
answer.  Your guess will probably be correct.
 be chosen if the area of the rectangle is to be as large as possible?  What
is
the area of this largest rectangle?  Before doing the problem you should guess
the
answer.  Your guess will probably be correct.
Let  be the length of one side of the rectangle.  Then
 be the length of one side of the rectangle.  Then  so
 so
 ; i.e.,
; i.e.,  is a function of
 is a function of  .  Let
.  Let  be the area
of a
rectangle with side
 be the area
of a
rectangle with side  .  Then
.  Then
 
 
 has only one critical point, namely
 has only one critical point, namely 
 , and
, and
 
 is continuous on
 is continuous on 
![$\displaystyle {\Big[
0,{l\over
2}\Big]}$](img3334.gif) we know that
 we know that  has a maximum and a minimum, and since
 has a maximum and a minimum, and since  is
differentiable on
 is
differentiable on 
 the extreme points are a
subset
of
 the extreme points are a
subset
of 
 .  Since
.  Since 
 the maximal area is
 the maximal area is 
 ; i.e., the
maximal
rectangle is a square.  (As you probably guessed.)
; i.e., the
maximal
rectangle is a square.  (As you probably guessed.)
This problem is solved by Euclid in completely geometrical terms [17, vol 1 page 382].
Euclid's proof when transformed from geometry to algebra becomes the following.
Suppose in our problem  , say
, say  .  Since
.  Since 
 , it
follows that
, it
follows that 
 (if
 (if  and
 and  were both less than
 were both less than
 , we'd get a contradiction, and if they were both greater than
, we'd get a contradiction, and if they were both greater than
 , we'd get a contradiction).  Let
, we'd get a contradiction).  Let  be defined by
 be defined by
 
 so
 so
 
 ,
, 
 and to get a maximum we
must have
 and to get a maximum we
must have  and
 and 
 .  This proof requires knowing the
answer ahead
of time (but you probably were able to guess it).  In any case, Euclid's
argument
is special, whereas our calculus proof applies in many situations.
.  This proof requires knowing the
answer ahead
of time (but you probably were able to guess it).  In any case, Euclid's
argument
is special, whereas our calculus proof applies in many situations.
Quadratic polynomials can be minimized (or maximized) without calculus by completing the square. For example, we have
 
 for all
 for all
 and equality holds only if
and equality holds only if 
 .  This technique applies only
to quadratic polynomials.
.  This technique applies only
to quadratic polynomials.
This is a straightforward problem, and in the next exercise you will do it by using calculus. Here I want to indicate how to do the problem without calculation. Imagine that the wall is a mirror, and that my fence is reflected in the wall.
 
 and
 and  , then I
have
maximized the area of a rectangle bounded by 200 feet of fence (on four sides)
with
sides
, then I
have
maximized the area of a rectangle bounded by 200 feet of fence (on four sides)
with
sides  and
 and  .  From the previous problem the answer to this problem is a
square with
.  From the previous problem the answer to this problem is a
square with  .  Hence, the answer to my original question is
.  Hence, the answer to my original question is  ,
,
 .  Often optimization problems have solutions that can be guessed on the
basis of symmetry.  You should try to guess answers to these problems before
doing
the calculations.
.  Often optimization problems have solutions that can be guessed on the
basis of symmetry.  You should try to guess answers to these problems before
doing
the calculations.
 and height
 and height  with a
volume of
 with a
volume of  cubic feet (
 cubic feet ( is a constant).  How should I choose
 is a constant).  How should I choose  and
 and
 if the amount of tin in the can is to be minimum?
if the amount of tin in the can is to be minimum?
 
Here I don't see any obvious guess to make for the answer.
I have 
 
 .  Let
.  Let  be the surface area of the can
of
radius
 be the surface area of the can
of
radius  .  Then
.  Then
 
 is
 is 
 .  It is clear that
.  It is clear that 
 , and
, and 
 .  Now
.  Now 
 .  The only critical point for
.  The only critical point for  is
 is 
 (call this number
 (call this number  ).  Then
).  Then 
 .  We see that
.  We see that 
 for
 for  and
 and 
 for
 for 
 so
 so  is decreasing on
 is decreasing on
![$(0,r_0]$](img3371.gif) and
 and  is increasing on
 is increasing on  and thus
 and thus  has a minimum
at
 has a minimum
at  .  The value of
.  The value of  corresponding to
 corresponding to  is
 is
 
In the following four exercises see if you can make a reasonable guess to the solutions before you use calculus to find them.
 from
the
corners of a
 from
the
corners of a 
 square, and folding up the corners as indicated in the
figure.
 square, and folding up the corners as indicated in the
figure. 
 
 be chosen to make the volume of the box as large as
possible?
 be chosen to make the volume of the box as large as
possible?
 that are
nearest
to the point
 that are
nearest
to the point 
 .
.
 and let
 and let 
 .  Find the point(s) r on
the
.  Find the point(s) r on
the
 -axis so that path from
-axis so that path from 
 to r  to q is as short as possible;
i.e.,
such that length([p
r])
 to r  to q is as short as possible;
i.e.,
such that length([p
r])  length([r
q]) is as short as possible.
 length([r
q]) is as short as possible.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
