 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 be a real valued function such that
 be a real valued function such that 
 .  Let
.  Let
 .  We say that
.  We say that  is differentiable at
 is differentiable at  if
 if  is an
interior point of
 is an
interior point of 
 and the limit
 and the limit
 , and we
call
, and we
call
 the derivative of
 the derivative of  at
 at  .
.
 
 represents the slope of the line
joining the points
 represents the slope of the line
joining the points 
 and
 and 
 on the graph of
 on the graph of
 .  If
.  If  and
 and  are different points in
 are different points in 
 then this quotient will
be
defined.  If we choose a sequence of points
 then this quotient will
be
defined.  If we choose a sequence of points  converging to
 converging to  , and if
the
slopes
, and if
the
slopes 
 converge to a number
 converge to a number
 which is independent of the sequence
which is independent of the sequence  , then it is reasonable to call
, then it is reasonable to call
 (i.e.,
(i.e.,  ) the slope of the tangent
line to the graph of
) the slope of the tangent
line to the graph of  at
 at
 .
.
 be a
 be a
 , and let
, and let 
 .  If
.  If  is differentiable at
 is differentiable at  then we define the slope of the
tangent
to graph
 then we define the slope of the
tangent
to graph at the point
 at the point 
 to be the number
 to be the number  , and
we define the tangent to graph
, and
we define the tangent to graph at
 at 
 to be the line
that
passes through
 to be the line
that
passes through 
 with slope
 with slope  .
.
Remark: This definition will need to be generalized later to apply to curves that are not graphs of functions. Also this definition does not allow vertical lines to be tangents, whereas on geometrical grounds, vertical tangents are quite reasonable.
 at a generic point
 at a generic point
 .
.  
Let  .  Then for all
.  Then for all 
 ,
,
 
 at
 at  is the line through
 is the line through  with slope
with slope  , and the equation of the tangent line is
, and the equation of the tangent line is
 
 
 
 
 then
 then
 
We saw in example 10.10 that 
 does
not
exist.  Hence, the graph of
 does
not
exist.  Hence, the graph of  at
 at  has no tangent.
 has no tangent.
If  , then in the previous example we saw that the equation of the
tangent
to graph
, then in the previous example we saw that the equation of the
tangent
to graph at
 at  is
 is  ; i.e., the
; i.e., the  -axis is tangent to the curve. 
Note that in this case the tangent line crosses the curve at the point of
tangency.
-axis is tangent to the curve. 
Note that in this case the tangent line crosses the curve at the point of
tangency.
If  then for all
 then for all 
 ,
,
 
 at
 at  is
 is
 
 .
.
Thus at each point on the curve the tangent line coincides with the curve.
Let 
 .  This is not the same as the function
.  This is not the same as the function  since
the domain of
since
the domain of  is
 is 
 while the domain of
 while the domain of  is
 is 
 .  (For
all
.  (For
all 
 we have
 we have 
 where
 where  .)
.)
I want to investigate 
 .  From the picture, I expect this graph to have an infinite
slope at
.  From the picture, I expect this graph to have an infinite
slope at  , which means according to our definition that there is no
tangent
line at
, which means according to our definition that there is no
tangent
line at  .  Let
.  Let 
 .  Then
.  Then
 , but
, but
 
 does not exist and hence
 does not exist and hence
 does not exist.
 does not exist.
 for
 for 
 .  Let
.  Let 
 and
let
 and
let
 . Then
. Then
 
 
 ,
together with the sum and quotient rules for limits.
,
together with the sum and quotient rules for limits.
 .  Sketch the graph of
.  Sketch the graph of  .  For what values
of
.  For what values
of  do you expect
 do you expect  to be
 to be  ?  For what values of
?  For what values of  do you expect
 do you expect
 to be positive? 
What do you expect to happen to
to be positive? 
What do you expect to happen to  when
 when  is a small positive number? 
What
do you expect to happen to
 is a small positive number? 
What
do you expect to happen to  when
 when  is a small negative
number?
 is a small negative
number?
Calculate  for arbitrary
 for arbitrary 
 .  Does your answer agree with
your
prediction?
.  Does your answer agree with
your
prediction?
 for
 for  .  Sketch the graph of
.  Sketch the graph of  .  Use the
same
scale on the
.  Use the
same
scale on the  -axis and the
-axis and the  -axis.
-axis.
On what intervals do you expect  to be positive?  On what intervals do
you
expect
 to be positive?  On what intervals do
you
expect  to be negative?  Calculate
 to be negative?  Calculate  .
.
On the basis of symmetry, what do you expect to be the values of  ,
,
 and
 and  ?  For what
?  For what  do you expect
 do you expect  to be zero?  On
the
basis of your guesses and your calculated value of
 to be zero?  On
the
basis of your guesses and your calculated value of  , draw a graph of
, draw a graph of
 ,
where
,
where  is the function that assigns
 is the function that assigns  to a generic number
 to a generic number  in
 in
 . On the basis of your graph, guess a formula for
. On the basis of your graph, guess a formula for  .
. 
(Optional) Prove that your guess is correct. (Some trigonometric identities will be needed.)
 if
 if  .
.
 that pass
through the point
 that pass
through the point  . Make a sketch of graph
. Make a sketch of graph and the
tangent lines.
 and the
tangent lines.
 whose graph is shown below.
 whose graph is shown below.
 
For what  in
 in  does
 does  exist?  Sketch the graphs
of
 exist?  Sketch the graphs
of  and
 and  on the same set of axes.
 on the same set of axes.
The following definition which involves time and motion and particles is not a part of our official development and will not be used for proving any theorems.
 move on a number line in such a way that its
coordinate at time
 move on a number line in such a way that its
coordinate at time  is
 is  , for all
, for all  in some interval
 in some interval  .  (Here time
is
thought of as being specified by a number.)  If
.  (Here time
is
thought of as being specified by a number.)  If  are points in
 are points in  with
with  , then the average velocity
of
, then the average velocity
of 
 for the time interval
 for the time interval
![$[t_0,t_1]$](img2821.gif) is defined to be
 is defined to be
 
 is not necessarily the same as the distance moved in
the
time interval
 is not necessarily the same as the distance moved in
the
time interval ![$[t_0,t_1]$](img2821.gif) .  For example, if
.  For example, if  then
 then  ,
but
the distance moved by
,
but
the distance moved by 
 in the time interval
 in the time interval ![$[0,1]$](img908.gif) is
 is 
 . 
(The particle moves from
. 
(The particle moves from  to
 to 
 at time
 at time 
 ,
and
then back to
,
and
then back to  .)
.)
The instantaneous velocity
 
of 
 at a time
 at a time  is defined to be
 is defined to be
 
 at
 at  is not defined.)  If we draw the graph
of the function
 is not defined.)  If we draw the graph
of the function
 ; i.e.,
; i.e., 
 , then the velocity of
, then the velocity of 
 at
time
 at
time  is by definition
 is by definition  slope of tangent to graph
 slope of tangent to graph at
 at 
 .
. 
In applications we will usually express velocity in units like 
 .  We will wait until we have developed some
techniques for differentiation before we do any velocity problems.
.  We will wait until we have developed some
techniques for differentiation before we do any velocity problems.
The definition of velocity just given would have made no sense to Euclid or Aristotle. The Greek theory of proportion does not allow one to divide a length by a time, and Aristotle would no more divide a length by a time than he would add them. Question: Why is it that today in physics you are allowed to divide a length by a time, but you are not allowed to add a length to a time?
In Newton's calculus, the notion of instantaneous velocity or fluxion was taken as an undefined, intuitively understood concept, and the fluxions were calculated using methods similar to that used in the section 10.1.
The first ``rigorous'' definitions of limit of a function were given around 1820 by Bernard Bolzano (1781-1848) and Augustin Cauchy (1789-1857)[23, chapter 1]. The definition of limit of a function in terms of limits of sequences was given by Eduard Heine in 1872.
 
 
 
 
 
  
