POL 422: Nuclear Politics

Draft Syllabus updated 2009-09-01

Prof. Alex Montgomery

ahm@reed.edu

(503) 517-7395




Class

Office



TuTh 2:40-4:00

MWF 4:00-5:00 or by appointment
Eliot 216

Eliot 204B
https://moodle.reed.edu/course/view.php?id=358

http://www.reed.edu/~ahm/



Course Description and Goals

Full course for one semester. This course investigates the origins and effects of the spread of nuclear weapons at international and domestic levels. It begins with a discussion of the morality of nuclear weapons, the motives different states have for obtaining them, and the problems with intelligence on states’ progress. It continues with asking what nuclear strategies have been and should be used, then moves to social constructivist critiques of conventional understandings of nuclear weapons as well as debates over the safety of such weapons. The latter half of the class concentrates on case studies of a variety of programs, including Iran and North Korea as well as proliferation networks and terrorism. Conference.

Requirements

Readings

Readings for the course will be supplied for the students on their Kindles. All students are expected to have an understanding of all of the readings. The syllabus will be updated frequently.

Course Website

Discussion and collaboration is available to you through the website; supplemental and core readings will be made available there; and assignments will be turned in electronically using the site.

Assignments

There is one assignment for this course, a lengthy (2500-5000 word) essay analyzing anything related to nuclear politics; it is due on Wednesday, December 9 at 5 PM.

Citation and Plagiarism

A major goal of this course is to encourage good reading, research, and citation habits. Good research requires good documentation of sources and the ability to put one’s own analysis and thoughts into a paper rather than relying on others. When in doubt as to whether you should cite something, always do it. Citations are required for ideas as well as facts, and are imperative even if you are not directly quoting authors. Make sure that you provide as specific a citation as possible; if an author discusses an idea in one section or one page, cite the specific section or page instead of the full article or book. I usually recommend that students use in-text author-date citation with full Chicago Manual of Style citations; see their Citation Quick Guide: <http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools˙citationguide.html>.

However, style is less important than the cites being present. If you use an idea or a fact without attribution, you are plagiarizing someone else’s work. Plagiarism and cheating are violations of academic integrity and thus violations of Reed’s Honor Principle. As specified by Reed’s academic conduct policy, such violations will result in disciplinary actions, including suspension or permanent dismissal from the College. Plagiarism is submitting a piece of work which in part or in whole is not entirely the student’s own work without attributing those same portions to their correct source. For examples of plagiarism and how to avoid it, see <http://www.csub.edu/ssric-trd/howto/plagiarism.htm> For more information on Reed’s policies see: <http://www.reed.edu/academic/gbook/comm˙pol/acad˙conduct.html>.

Accommodations

If you’d like to request academic accommodations due to a disability, please contact Learning Resources Director Libby Rapkoch, Psy.D., Dorothy Johansen House, 503-517-7921, rapkoche@reed.edu. If you have a letter from Student Services, please let me know so we can discuss those accommodations.

3-Sep: 01.2. Technology: How do you make a nuclear weapon? What can they do? (172 Pages)

Further

8-Sep: 02.1. The Bomb, Dread, + Eternity: The Atomic Cafe (film) (21 Pages)

10-Sep: 02.2. Hiroshima: Why did we use the bomb? Should we have? (81 Pages)

Further

15-Sep: 03.1. Motives: Why do states seek the bomb? (131 Pages)

Further

17-Sep: 03.2. Motives: How do we know? (120 Pages)

22-Sep: 04.1. Intel: Can we really know who is seeking the bomb? (130 Pages)

24-Sep: 04.2. Strategy: What should we do with it? (114 Pages)

Further

29-Sep: 05.1. SCOT (Social Construction of Technology): What does the bomb mean? (162 Pages)

Further

1-Oct: 05.2. SCOT 2: How does that meaning affect what we do? (116 Pages)

6-Oct: 06.1. Control: What attempts have been made to keep them from it? (134 Pages)

Further

8-Oct: 06.2. Control: What are we doing to defend ourselves? (75 Pages)

13-Oct: 07.1. Impact: What has the spread of nuclear weapons led to? (145 Pages)

15-Oct: 07.2. Safety: How safe are we or others in making the bomb? (96 Pages)

Further

20-Oct: 08.1. Fall Break - No Class

22-Oct: 08.2. Fall Break - No Class

27-Oct: 09.1. Nuclear Networks: The Wrath of Khan? (138 Pages)

Further

29-Oct: 09.2. North Korea: Pariah or Persuadable? (112 Pages)

Further

3-Nov: 10.1. Libya: Incompetent or Uninspired? (153 Pages)

5-Nov: 10.2. Iran: Determined or Deterrable? (146 Pages)

Further

10-Nov: 11.1. Ukraine, Belarus, and South Africa: Success Stories? (141 Pages)

Further

12-Nov: 11.2. India, Pakistan, and Israel: Renegades or the future of Proliferation? (92 Pages)

Further

17-Nov: 12.1. Australia, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan: Why didn’t they? (131 Pages)

Further

19-Nov: 12.2. Argentina and Brazil: Did they or didn’t they? (127 Pages)

Further

24-Nov: 13.1. Terrorists: Should we worry about them? (82 Pages)

Further

26-Nov: 13.2. Thanksgiving Break - No Class

1-Dec: 14.1. Conclusions: What should we do about all this? (109 Pages)

3-Dec: 14.2. Presentations

8-Dec: 15.1. Presentations